Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

State and Territorial Firefighter Cancer Presumption and Benefit Structures in the United States (2026 Dataset)

Authors: Zielinski, Alex;

State and Territorial Firefighter Cancer Presumption and Benefit Structures in the United States (2026 Dataset)

Abstract

This dataset provides a comprehensive, jurisdiction‑level reference of firefighter cancer presumption laws and related benefit programs across all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories. It catalogs statutory presumption systems, hybrid programs, cancer‑specific benefit structures, and eligibility frameworks as they existed on February 7, 2026, creating a unified national snapshot of how firefighter occupational cancer is recognized and compensated within diverse legal systems. The dataset includes detailed variables describing: Presumption types (statutory presumption, hybrid systems, benefit programs, mandatory insurance structures). Eligibility definitions for full‑time, part‑time, volunteer, paid‑on‑call, contract, and industrial/private‑sector firefighters (including formal coding of industrial inclusion/exclusion, a rarely documented dimension in national datasets). Service requirements, baseline medical exam conditions, carcinogen exposure criteria, and cancer‑specific timelines. Enumerated cancer lists for each jurisdiction, including jurisdictions that recognize broad cancer categories or “any cancer” presumptions. Statutory citations, links to primary sources, and verification dates for each entry. Detailed notes capturing statutory interpretation issues, dual‑status clauses, conditional eligibility, and administrative nuances that affect how presumptions are applied. This dataset was compiled through systematic review of state statutes, workers’ compensation laws, firefighter benefit program documents, and state agency guidance. Each jurisdiction’s entry includes coding decisions based on explicit statutory language, with ambiguous cases resolved through documented interpretive rules. Data were validated individually, with each row containing a Date Verified field to support transparent versioning and reproducibility. Intended users of this dataset include Researchers studying occupational cancer, firefighter health outcomes, or state‑level policy disparities Fire service leaders, training officers, and labor organizations seeking clarity on cancer coverage and eligibility Legal scholars and policymakers evaluating statutory gaps or inequities Industrial fire brigades assessing whether private‑sector firefighters receive statutory protections Public health professionals conducting cancer‑risk analyses and exposure studies This dataset is designed to be FAIR, fully citable, and adaptable for: comparative policy analysis, epidemiological modeling, statutory coverage gap assessment, and documentation of longitudinal statutory changes. Future versions may incorporate legislative updates, expanded variable sets, or deeper coding of carcinogen‑specific exposure criteria.

Keywords

cancer types, workers' compensation, public policy, service requirements, firefighter health, occupational cancer, fire service, hybrid presumption, industrial firefighters, presumption statute, volunteer firefighters, occupational health, U.S. state legislation, presumption laws, benefit program, statutory coverage, firefighter cancer, emergency services, cancer presumption, carcinogen exposure

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average