Abstract This paper presents a comprehensive statistical analysis of the Voynich Manuscript (MS408), proposing its interpretation as technical documentation of a formal system rather than encrypted natural language. Through rigorous quantitative analysis of 116,755 words from the complete EVA transcription, we demonstrate that MS408 exhibits statistical properties inconsistent with natural language but strongly aligned with formal technical protocols. Key Statistical Findings: Type-Token Ratio (TTR): 0.130 — Places MS408 strictly within the range of formal languages (0.1–0.3), effectively ruling out natural language encryption (typically 0.4–0.6). Zipf’s Law: $\alpha = 1.27 \pm 0.07$ — Matches technical documentation and server logs, distinct from natural narrative ($\alpha \approx 1.0$). Structural Formality: 38.7% of the corpus is concentrated in the top-10 bigram patterns. Sequential Determinism: 47% of word-pair sequences show deterministic repetition, characteristic of procedural protocols. Conclusion: Using Bayesian inference, we assess the "Systemic Protocol" hypothesis at 85% probability. We propose a paradigm shift from cryptanalytic to systems-engineering approaches in Voynich research. This document (v3.0) supersedes previous hypotheses regarding the "R&D Logbook".