Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease Using Decision Tree Machine Learning Model

Authors: Sotonwa, Kehinde Adebola; Osilade, Adetunrayo Abiodun; Aribisala, Benjamin Segun;

Diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease Using Decision Tree Machine Learning Model

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a health condition that happens when the kidneys can no longer filter toxins effectively from the blood. Also known as renal failure, CKD is a progressive and irreversible condition managed mainly through hemodialysis or kidney transplantation. Traditional diagnosis methods are predominantly manual, which can be slow and susceptible to human error. Consequently, there is increasing interest in automated diagnostic systems powered by machine learning (ML), although many existing models still have performance limitations. This study focuses on developing a Decision Tree (DT) classifier for CKD diagnosis. Data was sourced from the UCI Machine Learning Repository, comprising 400 individuals 250 with CKD and 150 without the condition. The dataset includes 24 features, and feature selection was performed using chi-square method. The data was split into a 70:30 ratios for training and testing, and a DT model was built and evaluated using sensitivity analysis. The DT model achieved excellent performance, recording 97% accuracy, 93% precision, 97% recall, and a 95% F1-measure. These results demonstrate strong predictive capability and indicate that the model is highly promising for automated CKD detection. Future research should explore deploying ML models for real-time clinical diagnosis.

Keywords

Machine Learning, hemodialysis, Decision Trees, Machine learning, chronic kidney disease

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!