Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

An Epistemological and Ethical Examination of AI-Assisted Writing in Postgraduate Research at the Federal University of Lafia

Authors: Agede, Jesse Iorfaga Agede; Ottoh-Agede, Blossom Shimayam;

An Epistemological and Ethical Examination of AI-Assisted Writing in Postgraduate Research at the Federal University of Lafia

Abstract

AI-assisted writing tools have become popular, furnished with the ability to help with language and text-generation, correcting grammar, and suggesting content. However, increased dependence and reliance on AI in writing research raises ethical questions about authorship and knowledge production. This paper, therefore, examines the epistemological implications of AI-assisted writing in FULafia PG research, pointing out the ethical issues that arise when machines interfere in human writing. Drawing from participatory observation in seminar papers and proposal presentations among a select-group of FULafia PG-students, the quantitative data revealed 82% of students’ research being highly AI-assisted, while 18% indicated averagely AI-assisted; using textual analysis, insights were gained into the co-construction of knowledge and the advantages and disadvantages of such collaboration. This study reveals the ethical side of AI-assisted writing; bearing in mind the consequences for knowledge production, academic integrity, and the future of writing in FULafia PG programmes. Howbeit, exploring the connection of AI-writing and ethics, this research concludes that there is a multifaceted relationship between students, machines, and the written text. Thus, recommends accountable and credible practices in AI-assisted research among FULafia PG students.

Keywords

epistemological inquiry, knowledge production, research writing, artificial intelligence, ethics, fulafia pg-students

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!