Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Closing the carbon removal attribution gap requires an objective atmospheric basis

Authors: Ringsby, Alexandra; Roston, Marc; Mallarino, Gian; Radic, Mislav; Maher, Kate;

Closing the carbon removal attribution gap requires an objective atmospheric basis

Abstract

Efforts to integrate carbon dioxide removal (CDR) into climate policy, markets, and inventories are advancing rapidly, but without a unified accounting logic to attribute atmospheric impacts. Existing crediting approaches omit upstream emissions, creating a structural "attribution gap" in which removals are credited even as associated emissions remain in the atmosphere. Although it remains small today, we find that this gap could reach gigaton-scale annually in biomass-based CDR systems. To address this discrepancy, we propose an Objective Atmospheric Basis (OAB): a technology-agnostic accounting framework that tracks carbon transfers explicitly using mass-balance ledger that casts emissions as persistent liabilities and removals as assets. Applied to feedstock materials for biochar carbon removal (BCR), OAB reveals how system boundaries and emissions allocation decisions shape net removal outcomes. By reconciling emissions and removals within a single atmospheric reference frame, OAB closes the attribution gap and provides core infrastructure for scalable, high-integrity CDR. As a common language for carbon bookkeeping grounded in physical fluxes, OAB enables consistent crediting across jurisdictions, supports policy decision-making, and strengthens alignment between Article 6 implementation and global temperature goals.

Keywords

lca, carbon accounting, standards, biochar, article 6

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average