This package presents a pre-ethical decision-preparation framework designed to make assumptions, framing effects, and authority conditions visible in complex educational decisions. The framework addresses a persistent gap in educational decision-making: the absence of systematic tools for examining implicit assumptions and decision conditions before evaluative or normative judgments are applied. Unlike ethics frameworks, governance policies, or accountability systems, this instrumentation operates upstream—in the decision preparation phase—without defining values, prescribing outcomes, or determining fairness. The framework provides three core components: 1. Assumption mapping - documentation of background beliefs shaping decisions 2. Frame-effect awareness - identification of interpretive lenses influencing perception 3. Asymmetry and authority acknowledgment - explicit documentation of structural power conditions This package includes: - Complete conceptual and operational framework documentation with practical templates - Implementation guidance for district-level pilots and ministry-level adoption - Internal adoption support materials and language guidance The framework is designed for voluntary use by educators, administrators, policymakers, and researchers working with consequential decisions under conditions of uncertainty, time pressure, and structural asymmetry. It is additive, non-evaluative, and compatible with existing governance structures. The framework produces documentation, not directives. It surfaces conditions without resolving them, preserves professional judgment and institutional authority, and operates by making decision preparation visible rather than automating or prescribing outcomes. Empirical status: This framework is presented as a proposed instrumentation model developed through conceptual analysis and synthesis of known failure modes in educational decision-making. It has not been validated through controlled experimental trials and makes no claims regarding improvement in educational outcomes, equity metrics, or performance indicators. KEYWORDS Decision preparation, Educational governance, Assumption visibility, Frame awareness, Pre-ethical analysis, Institutional transparency, Decision hygiene, Educational policy, Structural asymmetry, Decision documentation, Educational decision-making, Governance instrumentation