Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ figsharearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
figshare
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
figshare
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Immune-Skewed Synaptic Pruning Drives Bipolar Disorder Risk and Is Amplified by Cognitive Reserve

Authors: Cheung, Ngo;

Immune-Skewed Synaptic Pruning Drives Bipolar Disorder Risk and Is Amplified by Cognitive Reserve

Abstract

Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is highly heritable and shares genetic overlap with schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD), yet its core pathophysiological mechanisms remain unresolved. While glutamatergic dysregulation has been emphasized, excessive synaptic pruning—particularly immune-mediated—has emerged as a candidate from schizophrenia research. We competitively tested pruning versus glutamatergic/plasticity pathways using multi-method genomic analysis of recent large-scale GWAS data, with parallel MDD replication to delineate shared and disorder-specific signals. Methods: European-ancestry BD GWAS summary statistics (effective N ≈ 137,097) and trans-ancestry MDD data (European subsample effective N ≈ 829,250) were analyzed via: (1) MAGMA gene-based and competitive gene-set testing with overlap-controlled pruning (core, expanded, specific) and glutamatergic sets plus controls; (2) stratified LD score regression for partitioned heritability; (3) S-PrediXcan transcriptome-wide association in six brain tissues; (4) two-sample Mendelian randomization for neuroplasticity proxies (e.g., educational attainment); and (5) supplementary gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) with differential contrasts. Results: Pruning pathways dominated BD across methods: expanded/specific sets achieved Bonferroni significance in MAGMA and strong LDSC enrichment, persisting independently of glutamatergic overlap. TWAS showed activation-skewed pruning (upregulated microglial/autophagy activators) with modest glutamatergic signals; GSEA reinforced immune subpath skew (e.g., MHC, schizophrenia-associated). Mendelian randomization revealed genetically proxied higher educational attainment causally increases BD risk (IVW OR = 1.403, p = 6.69 × 10⁻⁵) but protects against MDD (OR ≈ 0.72). MDD showed robust heritability-level pruning but mediated expression and protective reserve effects. Conclusions: Immune-skewed synaptic pruning emerges as the primary pathway in BD, yielding inflammation-vulnerable circuits amplified into episodic instability by cognitive reserve—distinguishing it from MDD's downstream pruning deficits. These findings reframe BD toward neuroimmune-pruning models with implications for targeted therapeutics and cross-disorder classification.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average