Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

DAEDALUS Research Convergence Matrices: Multi-Model Analysis of Cognitive Architecture Patterns for AI Agents

Authors: Leu, Dumitru-Cristian;

DAEDALUS Research Convergence Matrices: Multi-Model Analysis of Cognitive Architecture Patterns for AI Agents

Abstract

Research dataset containing two convergence matrices analyzing architectural patterns for cognitive AI agents, produced as part of the DAEDALUS research project. METHODOLOGY:Identical research questions about agent memory architecture and cognitive scaffolding patterns were independently posed to three to four AI models (Claude Opus 4.5, Gemini, ChatGPT, Mistral). Each model conducted literature- grounded analysis, and responses were systematically compared to identify convergent patterns (high confidence), divergent recommendations, and unique insights. Primary sources cited by the models were manually verified against original publications. This methodology treats AI models as parallel literature survey tools, not as evaluators. The convergence is in the published literature the models reference, not in the models' opinions. DOCUMENT 1: DAEDALUS Convergence Matrix (January 27, 2026) Three-source synthesis (Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT) covering 23 architectural patterns across 10 domains: memory architecture, reasoning, self-reflection, safety, multi-agent coordination. Includes tiered confidence levels, anti-pattern warnings, and gap analysis against 12 existing agent memory frameworks. Systems analyzed: Zep/Graphiti, MemGPT/Letta, Mem0, LangChain, Clawdbot/Moltbot, Stanford Generative Agents, EverMemOS, HippoRAG, Reflexion, CASS, Omi, LobeHub. DOCUMENT 2: Cognitive Scaffolding Convergence Matrix (February 2, 2026) Four-source synthesis (Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT, Mistral) covering 21 cognitive scaffolding patterns from SOAR, ACT-R, CLARION, LIDA, SOFAI architectures, Extended Mind thesis, Distributed Cognition, and Cognitive Tools research. KEY FINDINGS:- 100% convergence (4/4 models) on: propose-validate separation, temporal memory, trust gradients, failure-indexed memory, bounded working memory, metacognitive monitoring, episodic/semantic distinction- 0/12 production memory systems implement trust-level differentiation between verified facts and AI-generated hypotheses- Three critical gaps identified: global workspace/competitive attention, consolidation/forgetting processes, visual reasoning scratchpads This gap analysis directly motivates the DAEDALUS dual-memory architecture with tri-color trust model (blue: human-verified, green: AI-suggested, red: constraint violations). Parent project: DAEDALUS (Cognitive AI Agent Architecture)Institution: University of Oradea, Romania

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, literature survey methodology, propose-validate, memory systems, SOAR, convergence analysis, ACT-R, AI agent architecture, multi-model analysis, cognitive scaffolding, agent memory survey, trust gradients, cognitive patterns, metacognition

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities