Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Systematic Review of Computational Methods for Cervical Cancer Detection

Authors: Salami-Ohida, Sefiyat Oyiza; Alade, Rahman Mukaila; Enikuomehin, Oluwatoyin Ayokule; Armato, Samuel; Ogunde, Adewale; Olopade, Olufunmilayo; Aribisala, Benjamin;

Systematic Review of Computational Methods for Cervical Cancer Detection

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women, especially in developing countries, and early detection is vital for effective treatment and improved survival. Several machine learning methods have been used for diagnosis; however, a systematic review is needed to understand progress in predictive outcomes and the challenges of applying computer-aided diagnosis in healthcare settings. This review, conducted using PRISMA guidelines, examines studies on machine learning and deep learning techniques used for cervical cancer detection, with the goal of identifying their strengths and weaknesses to support future research and practical use in healthcare. Peer-reviewed articles were selected from Google Scholar and PubMed using search terms such as “cervical cancer,” “machine learning,” “deep learning,” “classification,” “prediction,” and “detection,” and studies were included or excluded based on predefined criteria. Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 18 focused on deep learning. Deep learning models achieved accuracy, AUC, and F1 scores ranging from 77% to 99%, consistently outperforming other machine learning methods, which had scores between 61% and 99%. Overall, deep learning methods have demonstrated higher accuracy in detecting cervical cancer; however, future studies should validate these models using larger and more diverse datasets to improve reliability and clinical relevance.

Keywords

Machine Learning, cervical cancer, diagnosis, Diagnosis, Machine learning, Cervical cancer

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!