
This article proposes a theoretical framework integrating the Buddhist concept of the Fourfold Lotus with Social Relativity Theory in order to explain differences in perception, moral cognition and human responses within contemporary societies. It introduces the concepts of the “center of perceptual gravity” and “moral equilibrium” as structural mechanisms explaining harmony or conflict among individuals with differing cognitive and moral reference frames. The study argues that individuals possess unequal cognitive and moral gravities. Communication or moral guidance may therefore generate either constructive transformation or resistance, depending on the recipient’s level of perception. When reference frames differ significantly, guidance may be interpreted as pressure rather than development. Conversely, when moral and cognitive levels are relatively aligned, conflict diminishes and equilibrium emerges. This framework aligns with contemporary research in social psychology, behavioral science and moral psychology from leading academic institutions, confirming that differences in perceptual frameworks are key factors underlying resistance, misunderstanding and moral disagreement. The article concludes that sustainable moral community development requires structural understanding of varying perceptual levels within society.
Moral Cognition, Perceptual Frameworks, Fourfold Lotus Model, Social Relativity Theory, Moral Equilibrium
Moral Cognition, Perceptual Frameworks, Fourfold Lotus Model, Social Relativity Theory, Moral Equilibrium
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
