Abstract: Theory without practice is speculation; architecture without construction is drafting. The Myceloom Protocol articulates principles of digital sovereignty, reciprocity, and emergent intelligence. What does this mean when choosing a platform, joining a community, or adopting a tool? This report translates Myceloom's philosophical foundations into an actionable decision framework for digital citizens navigating contemporary infrastructure. Through four domains (Identity, Community, Tools, and Contribution), we present assessment criteria, evaluation questions, and practical orientations grounded in the protocol's core axioms. The framework synthesizes into Seven Questions that structure attention toward ownership, exit viability, governance legibility, extraction patterns, interoperability, reciprocity, and sustainability. This framework provides a lens: a way of seeing digital situations that makes sovereignty, community health, and long-term viability visible. The result is an orientation: a practiced way of inhabiting digital space that changes what becomes visible, what becomes possible, and what becomes necessary. Keywords: Digital Sovereignty, Decentralized Systems, Platform Governance, Exit Viability, Interoperability Standards, Reciprocal Networks, Infrastructure Assessment, Commons Sustainability, Autogravitas, Subsidiarity, Decision Framework, Myceloom Protocol