Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

DESIGNING AI-SUPPORTED LANGUAGE TASKS TO FOSTER COGNITIVE ENGAGEMENT

Authors: Ruziyeva, Maftuna;

DESIGNING AI-SUPPORTED LANGUAGE TASKS TO FOSTER COGNITIVE ENGAGEMENT

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is making language production easier, but it does not automatically make language learning deeper. When learners can generate sentences, essays, or ideas instantly, the risk is that thinking may be shortened while output becomes longer. This article approaches AI-supported language tasks from a linguo-cognitive perspective and asks a different question: not how AI helps students produce language, but how it can make them think through language. The paper argues that cognitive engagement emerges when learners question, reshape, and negotiate AI-generated content rather than consume it. AI is viewed not as a source of answers but as a stimulus for decision-making, reflection, and reasoning. Drawing on recent research in AI-assisted language learning and task-based pedagogy, the article highlights prompt design, adaptation of AI output, and iterative interaction as key pedagogical moves. AI-supported tasks become cognitively valuable when they slow learners down, require choices, and make reasoning visible. The article concludes that the real innovation of AI in language education lies not in automation, but in designing tasks where thinking cannot be outsourced.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!