Cults are conventionally described as deviant social formations characterized by manipulation, irrational belief, or charismatic domination. Although descriptively useful, such accounts do not explain the historical persistence, cross-cultural recurrence, or structural similarity of cult-like dynamics across domains including religion, politics, wellness culture, aesthetics, therapeutic communities, and identity movements. Content-based explanations further fail to clarify why systems with divergent beliefs may nevertheless produce convergent patterns of psychological capture and rigidity. This paper advances an architectural reframing in which cultic organization is understood not as pathological anomaly but as a conditional configuration of human meaning-making emerging when psychological continuation becomes structurally constrained. Integrating sociological, psychological, phenomenological, and systems-theoretic findings within a multidimensional architectural framework of psychological organization, cultic dynamics are situated as stabilizing responses to threatened agency, identity coherence, or temporal renegotiability. Cultic organization requires neither irrational belief nor total psychological capture and may arise within educated and socially normative contexts when exit or renegotiation becomes structurally penalized. Partial foreclosure of identity, choice, relational exit, or future orientation is sufficient to generate cult-like dynamics. Cult behavior is therefore reframed as a structurally intelligible response to threatened continuation under first-person constraint rather than as moral failure or cognitive defect. Rather than asserting that all systems are cultic, the paper specifies minimal structural conditions under which any system may become cultic and clarifies how systems cease to be cultic when authorship, exit capacity, and temporal renegotiability are restored. Permissions NoticeThis work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Any use involving adaptation, modification, translation, educational deployment, therapeutic application, derivative modeling, or inclusion in external platforms beyond unchanged archival hosting requires explicit written permission from the author.