Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Artificial Intelligence for Electrode Quality Control in Battery Manufacturing: Evaluating Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Transfer Learning Models for Tin, Zinc, and Titanium Electrodes

Authors: Nyabadza, Anesu;

Artificial Intelligence for Electrode Quality Control in Battery Manufacturing: Evaluating Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Transfer Learning Models for Tin, Zinc, and Titanium Electrodes

Abstract

This dataset consists of optical images of screen-printed electrodes collected for surface quality assessment in a laboratory manufacturing environment. The images are organized into three top-level folders, each corresponding to a different electrode material: Tin, Zinc, and Titanium. Within each material folder, images are further grouped by surface quality class. For Tin electrodes, the classes are Tin_good, Tin_medium, and Tin_bad. For Zinc electrodes, the classes are Zinc_good and Zinc_bad, and for Titanium electrodes, the classes are Titanium_good and Titanium_bad. Each image represents an individual printed electrode surface. All images were acquired using a consistent optical imaging setup under controlled lighting and magnification conditions following the screen-printing process. The dataset captures natural variations in print quality arising from process variability, including differences in surface homogeneity, edge definition, and defect presence. The dataset contains no synthetic or augmented images and reflects real inspection conditions encountered during electrode fabrication. This dataset is intended to support research in machine learning, computer vision, and automated visual inspection for printed electronics and related manufacturing applications.

Keywords

AI in manufacturing, battery electrodes, ResNet-50, hyperparameter tuning, Machine learning

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average