
Abstract & Methodology: This white paper builds on the prior work “Entangled Response Spaces: A Minimal Canonical Axiom Set for Cross-System Non-Causal Coupling” (https://zenodo.org/records/18362956).Core argumentative flow: The paper aims to investigate, in depth, the dynamic conditions under which cognitive boundaries are drawn and redrawn—“once boundary A is drawn, we find we must exclude B inside it, then preserve C within B, yet again remove D within C, and so on.” In this process, the author introduces an innovative physical model: the high-dimensional variant of Langton’s Ant (LADP).AI collaboration mechanism: This work is not written by a single human author alone. Instead, the author first proposed a set of preliminary hypotheses, which were then subjected to intensive logical adversarial testing and boundary negotiation by six major AI systems—DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and Perplexity. The final argumentative consolidation was achieved collectively by the AIs, with Gemini coordinating the production of the final text.Main academic contributions: Proposes and proves the “Definition Externalization Theorem.” Quantifies “Semantic Debt” in high-dimensional representational systems and analyzes its physical implications for the development of AGI. Provides a complete record of the six AI systems’ independent scores and multidimensional evaluations of the theory, marking an important milestone in human–AI co-creation within the emerging field of cognitive physics.
Semantic Debt, Cognitive Physics, ERS Theory, Human-AI Co-creation, Definition Externalization, Langton's Ant, AGI Limits, Symmetry Breaking
Semantic Debt, Cognitive Physics, ERS Theory, Human-AI Co-creation, Definition Externalization, Langton's Ant, AGI Limits, Symmetry Breaking
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
