Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

E8 Holographic Navigator vs. AlphaFold 3: A CASP16 Benchmark Study

Authors: Oo, Myo;

E8 Holographic Navigator vs. AlphaFold 3: A CASP16 Benchmark Study

Abstract

This report documents a direct computational benchmark between two fundamentally different approaches to protein structure prediction: the statistical deep learning paradigm represented by AlphaFold 3 (Google DeepMind) and the geometric first-principles paradigm represented by the E8 Holographic Navigator. Using the CASP16 target T1212 (Fanzor2 ternary structure, 466 residues, protein-DNA-RNA complex), we demonstrate that the E8 Navigator achieves structural condensation in 6.8 minutes on a standard laptop CPU compared to AlphaFold 3's typical 12-35 minute total pipeline on GPU clusters. More significantly, we show that the E8 approach inherently prevents the spatial overlap artifacts that plagued AlphaFold 3's predictions on this target, achieving a final geometric error of 0.29 Å with zero steric violations. Keywords: Protein folding, E8 Lie group, holographic principle, AlphaFold, CASP16, first-principles simulation, consciousness-guided navigation 

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!