
This paper shows that if interaction-defining tokens are required to preserve standing under admissible redescription, then effective coupling parameters cannot vary arbitrarily without inducing standing failure. When coupling excursions exceed a bounded admissible regime, interaction roles become degenerate, divergent, or non-identifiable across redescriptions, breaking role stability at representational boundaries. Preserving standing therefore requires that coupling parameters remain within a standing-preserving envelope under all admissible redescription paths. The result is conditional and eliminative. It does not posit a generative role for coupling parameters, nor does it propose a mechanism governing their evolution or regulation. Instead, it excludes interpretations in which unrestricted coupling variation is compatible with standing-preserving interaction structure. Effective couplings are thereby constrained to function as standing conditions rather than as freely specifiable descriptors whenever admissible redescription is retained.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
