Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Toward a Socio-Technical Framework for Digital Equity: Addressing Inequality in Nepal's Federalized E-Governance

Authors: Paudel, Deependra;

Toward a Socio-Technical Framework for Digital Equity: Addressing Inequality in Nepal's Federalized E-Governance

Abstract

Title: Toward a Socio-Technical Framework for Digital Equity: Addressing Inequality in Nepal’s Federalized E-Governance Subtitle: A Comparative Analysis of Bagmati and Karnali Provinces Abstract: This research paper addresses the persistent "uptake gap" in digital public services within transitioning economies, with a specific focus on Nepal’s federalized structure. By conducting a comparative analysis between the digitally advanced Bagmati Province and the marginalized Karnali Province, the study identifies how socio-technical barriers—such as grid instability, human resource flight, and digital trust—hinder equitable service delivery. The paper proposes a shift from infrastructure-centric models toward a multi-dimensional Socio-Technical Framework that integrates institutional readiness with citizen-centric trust mechanisms. Context & Significance: Drawing on the author’s 11 years of field experience as an ICT4D consultant with the UNDP and World Bank, this work provides a practitioner-researcher perspective on localized digital transformation. It builds upon previous research regarding governance readiness and aims to provide a scalable roadmap for inclusive digital impact in the Global South. Keywords: ICT4D, Digital Inequality, Socio-Technical Framework, E-Governance, Federalism in Nepal, Bagmati Province, Karnali Province, Digital Trust, Institutional Readiness, Digital Divide

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!