Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

Consciousness as Constraint: A Critical Engagement with Integrated Information Theory

Authors: Chao, Jaimes;

Consciousness as Constraint: A Critical Engagement with Integrated Information Theory

Abstract

Abstract This paper applies the bearer/constraint audit methodology developed in “From Substance to Constraint” to Integrated Information Theory (IIT); the most rigorous contemporary attempt to treat consciousness as a quantifiable property (Φ) instantiated by physical systems with specific causal architecture. IIT’s bearer-commitments generate stable structural tensions: the exclusion problem, the grain problem, the small-Φ problem, and temporal instability. These persist across theory versions because they are downstream consequences of treating consciousness as a bearer-property rather than a constraint-role. The Triaxial Existential Field (TEF) retypes consciousness as integrated reflexive availability under constraint, articulated through three irreducible roles; Coherence, Reflexivity, and Participation. This retyping yields three differential payoffs: (1) a clinically testable typology of consciousness disorders classifying by axis-failure rather than scalar degree; (2) cross-domain convergence with constraint-based treatments of time and quantum measurement; and (3) implementable architectural criteria for artificial consciousness where IIT’s Φ-maximisation remains computationally intractable. Explicit falsification conditions are stated. TEF is positioned as a methodological bet with concrete stakes in clinical classification and AI architecture.

Keywords

Triaxial Existential Field, constraint-based ontology, artificial consciousness, grain problem, Hard Problem, mental causation, exclusion problem, consciousness, falsifiability, disorders of consciousness, Integrated Information Theory, unity problem, philosophy of time

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!