Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Bone Frac Dataset

Authors: Eunice, Seraphina;

Bone Frac Dataset

Abstract

About Dataset Upper-Extremity Bone Fracture Segmentation & Detection (X-ray) A comprehensive dataset of upper-extremity X-ray images was prepared for automated bone fracture localization and classification in computer vision research. The primary goal of this dataset is to support the development and benchmarking of algorithms for fracture detection and pixel-level fracture segmentation on radiographs. The dataset includes X-ray images grouped into multiple fracture-related categories covering common anatomical regions of the upper limb. The provided classes (as defined in data.yaml) are: Elbow Positive Fingers Positive Shoulder Fracture Wrist Positive Humerus Forearm Fracture Humerus Fracture Each image is annotated with pixel-level segmentation masks (polygon-based), enabling precise localization of fracture regions. These mask annotations can also be used to derive bounding boxes, making the dataset suitable for both instance segmentation and object detection pipelines (e.g., Ultralytics/YOLO segmentation training and evaluation). Dataset Highlights Total images: 3,715 Train: 3,316 | Validation: 257 | Test: 142 Total annotated instances: 4,294 Annotation format: YOLO segmentation labels (normalized polygon coordinates) Application scenarios: fracture region localization, multi-class fracture recognition, detection-to-segmentation cascades, and clinical decision-support prototypes. By providing diverse fracture categories across upper-extremity regions, this dataset aims to facilitate robust model development for real-world radiographic fracture analysis, accelerating research in computer-aided diagnosis and improving clinical workflow efficiency.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average