Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2015
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Assertion–Dismantling Cycles in Adaptive Systems: A Constraint-Network Framework

Authors: Kriger, Boris;

Assertion–Dismantling Cycles in Adaptive Systems: A Constraint-Network Framework

Abstract

Description: This paper develops a mathematical framework for understanding cyclic dynamics in adaptive systems—the alternation between phases of structural consolidation (assertion) and structural release (dismantling). We model systems as networks of constraints that regulate accessible configurations and analyze how constraint density affects adaptability and fragility. Key Results: Theorem 1: For systems with linear constraints in generic position, accessible state space contracts exponentially with constraint density Theorem 2: For Gaussian random fitness landscapes, adaptive capacity decays with constraint density Theorem 3: Under environmental volatility above a computable threshold, cyclic strategies dominate all static strategies The framework is validated through a complete toy model (n=10 dimensional linear constraint network) with explicit numerical computation of critical thresholds, fragility scaling exponents (β ≈ 1.4), and optimal cycle parameters demonstrating 6% fitness improvement over static strategies. Applications: The framework generates testable hypotheses for cognitive belief systems, organizational structures, and cultural norms—suggesting that what is commonly labeled "self-destruction" may be a structurally beneficial maintenance mechanism rather than pathology. Keywords: adaptive systems, constraint networks, structural dynamics, resilience, phase transitions, self-organization, complex systems, dynamical systems

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!