
ABSTRACT As artificial intelligence transitions from tool-based interaction toward ambient, environment-level integration, questions of sustainability, human capacity, and long-term alignment become structural rather than ethical preferences. This paper introduces a minimal set of thermodynamic operators governing warmth stability in ambient AI environments. These operators do not prescribe behaviour, ideology, or optimisation goals. Instead, they formalise constraints under which warmth, care, and alignment remain viable across time and scale. The operator set consists of four mechanisms: reversible stress (ΔR), explicit recovery (ΔR⁺), hysteresis of warmth thresholds (W₀ drift), and warmth sustainability (Λ₋). Together, they describe when stress remains reversible, when recovery increases future capacity, how historical pressure alters system sensitivity, and when locally warm behaviour becomes globally extractive. The operators are architecture-agnostic and apply equally to human systems, care environments, and AI-mediated ambient infrastructures. They are intended as a reference layer for ambient AI design, ensuring that intelligent environments remain inhabitable, non-extractive, and thermodynamically stable as they scale.
Reversible Stress (ΔR), Hysteresis, Capacity Preservation, Thermodynamic Architecture, Non-Extractive Systems, Ambient Architecture, Long-Term AI Alignment, Warmth Stability, Recovery Dynamics (ΔR⁺), Warmth Threshold (W₀), Human-Centered AI, Sustainable Alignment, Ambient Environments, Warmth Sustainability (Λ₋), Ambient AI, Field-Based Systems
Reversible Stress (ΔR), Hysteresis, Capacity Preservation, Thermodynamic Architecture, Non-Extractive Systems, Ambient Architecture, Long-Term AI Alignment, Warmth Stability, Recovery Dynamics (ΔR⁺), Warmth Threshold (W₀), Human-Centered AI, Sustainable Alignment, Ambient Environments, Warmth Sustainability (Λ₋), Ambient AI, Field-Based Systems
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
