Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Lipsanini Enderlein 1935

Authors: Kameneva, Elena P.; Korneyev, Severyn V.; Korneyev, Valery A.;

Lipsanini Enderlein 1935

Abstract

Key to genera of the Chaetopsis group (Lipsanini) 1. Frontal setae strong, usually 2–3 × longer than parafrontal setulae at eye margin. ........ (Amethysa + Aspistomella group + Chaetopsis group) ............................... 2 — Frontal setulae all short, same length as parafrontal setulae at eye margin. ......... ................ (Euxesta and other Lipsanini) 2. Abdomen elongate with narrow pleura, oviscape usually longer than tergites 4 and 5 combined, if shorter, then aculeus and especially its cercal unit dorsoventrally flattened; if not clear, then either interfrontal setae absent, or postpedicel apically pointed, or head conspicuously longer than high with face oblique and without epistome, or vein CuA+CuP entirely or partly reduced. .... Chaetopsis group ............................... 3 — Abdomen broadly oval with pleural membrane at least 0.3 × as wide as sternites 3–5, oviscape shorter than tergites 4 and 5 combined, aculeus and cercal unit oval in section, not flattened; neither interfrontal setae completely absent, nor postpedicel apically pointed; head always higher than long, face vertical, often with conspicuously or strongly protruded epistome; vein CuA+CuP well developed. .............. .......... (Amethysa + Aspistomella group) 3. Cell cua lacking; wing less than 0.25 as wide as long ............. Steneretma Loew — Cell cua present; wing usually broader than described above .......................... 4 4. Vein CuA+CuP entirely absent; if present, then shorter than half of cell cua ........................... Eumecosomyia Hendel — Vein CuA+CuP well developed, if shortened, then at least as long as cell cua .... 5 5. Head twice longer than high ................. ............................. Eumetopiella Hendel — Head almost as long as high or higher than long ............................................. 6 6. Ventral portion of face receding ........... .................................. Stenomyia Hendel — Ventral portion of face slightly to strongly protruding anteriorly ............ 7 7. Vein R 1 setulose along pterostigma. Aculeus apically pointed ...................... ................... Parastenomyia new genus 1 Nearly half of species assigned to Chaetopsis (see Steyskal 1968) differ from the “core” related to its type species and need a revision with phylogenetic analysis and refining concept of that genus. — Vein R 1 bare. Aculeus apically truncate (or if, in some Zacompsia, pointed, then ventral portion of face strongly protruding anteriorly, in front of anterior margin of frons) .............................................. 8 8. Ventral portion of face strongly protruding anteriorly, in front of anterior margin of frons .............. Zacompsia Coquillett — Ventral portion of face moderately protruding ................................................ 9 9. Interfrontal setae or setulae absent. Postpedicel acute .............. Chaetopsis Loew — Interfrontal setae present. Postpedicel either acute or rounded .. Species incertae sedis provisionally assigned to Chaetopsis 1

Published as part of Kameneva, Elena P., Korneyev, Severyn V. & Korneyev, Valery A., 2025, Parastenomyia New Genus (Diptera: Ulidiidae: Lipsanini) From Costa Rica, Ecuador, And Peru, pp. 485-500 in Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 127 (3) on pages 494-495, DOI: 10.4289/0013-8797.127.3.485, http://zenodo.org/record/18484343

Related Organizations
Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Diptera, Animalia, Biodiversity, Ulidiidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!