
This study explores diffusion-based generative modeling as a data augmentation strategy to improve forecasting in data-scarce scenarios. Using the ETTh1 multivariate energy dataset, we evaluate point and quantile forecasting across multiple forecasting architectures (XGBoost, LSTM, BiLSTM). Synthetic samples are generated via the Diffusion-TS framework for the neural models only, and incorporated at varying synthetic-to-real ratios. Results show that BiLSTM models benefit substantially in point forecasting, achieving up to a 15.3% improvement (i.e., reduction) in RMSE and 8.1% in MAE, and similarly improve quantile accuracy, while LSTM models degrade under all ratios. Bias-variance analysis reveals that diffusion-based augmentation mainly reduces variance at moderate levels but introduces bias when excessive synthetic data are used.
Diffusion Models, Time-series Forecasting, Data Augmentation, Synthetic Data Generation
Diffusion Models, Time-series Forecasting, Data Augmentation, Synthetic Data Generation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
