Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Geometry of Admissible Computation: A Unified Thermodynamic Framework

Authors: Shrikant Bhosale;

The Geometry of Admissible Computation: A Unified Thermodynamic Framework

Abstract

Abstract This dataset contains the theoretical proofs and experimental verification for the Inverse Scaling Law (ISL). We propose that thermodynamic constraints impose a hard physical barrier on non-modular computation. Included Materials: ISL_Framework_Paper.pdf: Unified theoretical paper (Typeset). supplementary_proofs/: Detailed Theorem Proofs (PDFs). Theorem_01_Modularity.pdf Theorem_04_Reuse.pdf Theorem_07_Scope.pdf code/kill_switch_experiment.py: Source code for the generalization gap experiment. figures/: High-resolution verification plots. Key Results: Experimental validation confirmed a 38x efficiency gap between modular and monolithic architectures in data-starved regimes, supporting the Information Reuse Bound ($T \propto 1/R$). References: Landauer, R. (1961). Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM Journal of Research and Development. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal. Gromov, M. (1987). Hyperbolic groups. Essays in Group Theory. Bridson, M. R., & Haefliger, A. (1999). Metric spaces of non-positive curvature. Springer. Kolmogorov, A. N. (1965). Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information. Problems of Information Transmission. Bekenstein, J. D. (1981). Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems. Physical Review D.

Keywords

Computational Complexity, Hyperbolic Geometry, Artificial Intelligence, Thermodynamics, Modularity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!