Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

THE PHILOSOPHICAL, SOCIOLOGICAL, AND CULTURAL ROOTS OF THE CONCEPTS OF "WAR" AND "PEACE"

Authors: Abduraxmonov Murodbek;

THE PHILOSOPHICAL, SOCIOLOGICAL, AND CULTURAL ROOTS OF THE CONCEPTS OF "WAR" AND "PEACE"

Abstract

This article investigates the philosophical, sociological, and cultural foundations of the concepts of war and peace as central categories of human thought and social organization. Drawing on interdisciplinary theoretical perspectives, the study examines how these concepts have evolved through ethical philosophy, social theory, and cultural memory. War is analyzed as a manifestation of moral rupture, institutional imbalance, and collective trauma, while peace is interpreted not merely as the absence of armed conflict but as an active ethical and social process grounded in justice, responsibility, and symbolic representation. The research demonstrates that modern societies tend to normalize violence through bureaucratic rationalization and cultural narratives, whereas peace remains ethically valued yet symbolically marginalized. By integrating philosophical reasoning, sociological analysis, and cultural interpretation, the article reveals that war and peace are not opposing historical states but interdependent processes reflecting the moral condition of humanity. The findings highlight the crucial role of responsibility, memory, and social justice in sustaining peace and contribute to contemporary debates on conflict, ethics, and human coexistence.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average