Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Comparative Study of From-Scratch Squeezeformer Training for Arabic and English Speech Recognition

Authors: Desoky Ahmed, Habiba Mostafa;

A Comparative Study of From-Scratch Squeezeformer Training for Arabic and English Speech Recognition

Abstract

While modern speech recognition systems achieve impressive performance through large-scale pre-training, the fundamental relationship between orthographic properties and training efficiency in from-scratch models remains underexplored. This paper presents a systematic comparative study of Squeezeformer training dynamics for Arabic and English automatic speech recognition, both implemented from scratch without transfer learning. We demonstrate that despite Arabic's morphological complexity, it achieves superior character-level accuracy (13.72% CER vs 14.06% CER) and dramatically faster convergence (18 epochs vs 400 epochs) compared to English when trained with identical architectures. Our analysis attributes these differences to Arabic's phonetic transparency and orthographic consistency, which compensate for its morphological richness in character-level recognition tasks. The English model, trained on 190,000 samples, achieves 34.43% WER with 8.5M parameters, while the Arabic model, using only 78,531 samples and 19.01M parameters, reaches 45.24% WER with 22× faster convergence. These findings challenge conventional assumptions about resource requirements for morphologically rich languages and provide practical insights for low-resource ASR development

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!