Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

The Time-Domain Lattice in EHT Visibilities: A Glass–Crystal Audit Across Sgr A and M87**

Authors: Diogenes;

The Time-Domain Lattice in EHT Visibilities: A Glass–Crystal Audit Across Sgr A and M87**

Abstract

We report an **audit-grade, reproducible pipeline** for detecting a discrete, time-domain phase organization in Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) interferometric visibilities, which we operationally describe as a **glass–crystal “lattice”**: long-lived **domains** with sparse **hops** (glassy kinetics) governed by discrete harmonic “teeth” (crystalline structure) at **m = 24 and m = 48**. The conceptual map is deliberately modular: **Bank → Projector → Holonomy (operational proxy) → EHT statistics.** Here *Bank* denotes an internal **discrete governance space** (empirically captured by a **Z₄₈ cover** with **Z₂₄ structure**), *Projector* denotes the time-dependent channel by which the internal state becomes visible in the measured visibilities (including coverage/sensitivity gating and slow connection-like drift), and *Holonomy* is used strictly in an **operational** sense: a phase-transport/twist proxy constructed from harmonic coefficients, **not** a claim of spacetime torsion or modified gravity dynamics. The statistical endpoint is a **Z₃ coherence detector** evaluated on **HMM-decoded residual phases** with strict guardrails and matched null models. --- ## 1) Observables and the “Holonomy Proxy” (what we actually measure) From uvfits random-group parameters we use **(u, v, DATE)** and compute the geometric angle **φ_uv = atan2(v, u)**. We explicitly avoid uv-sector bucketing because it can manufacture spurious harmonics (a documented artifact where m≈24 and m≈48 appear “fake” under sectorization). All primary runs use **time-only buckets**. Within each time bucket we estimate the complex harmonic coefficient *c_m* by **weighted complex ridge regression** on the model - **V(φ) ≈ c₀ + c_m exp(− i m φ)** (m = 24, 48), with ridge λ scaled by per-bucket sample count and a short **complex-plane smoothing** (window=3) applied to coefficients. When full polarization is available (RR/LL/RL/LR), we form - **I = (RR + LL)/2** - **P = (RL + conj(LR))/2** and define per-harmonic “falls” - **d_m = wrap( arg c_m^I − arg c_m^P )** leading to the operational holonomy proxy - **γ = wrap( d_48 − d_24 )** (k = 1). When only Stokes-I is available (or RL/LR are numerically zero), we use the structural proxy - **γ_I = wrap( arg c_48^I − 2 arg c_24^I )**. --- ## 2) Glass domains and “Gold–Soft” decoding (why we don’t chase noise) The proxy γ(t) is decoded into a discrete **Z₄₈ state path** k(t) using a Viterbi/HMM-style objective with a **soft “gold rule”** transition regularizer: - log T_{jk} ∝ −λ_sparse·1[j≠k] − λ_step·|Δ(j→k)| on Z₄₈, combined with a cosine emission term weighted by per-bucket amplitude. This turns a brittle hop-set into a **regularized domain process**, sharply reducing spurious hopping while preserving real state changes. Residuals are then - **r(t) = wrap( γ(t) − θ_state(t) )**, with θ_k = 2πk/48. --- ## 3) The Z₃ detector (what constitutes a “lattice event”) We define a sliding-window triadic coherence statistic on residuals: - **S₃(t) = |⟨exp(i·3·r)⟩|**, computed only under strict **guardrails** (window half-width H, edge exclusion EDGE, and minimum effective samples **NEFF_MIN**) to avoid boundary artifacts and sparse-coverage hallucinations. For dual-band analysis (LO+HI), we use **common-coverage scoring** and a joint statistic (typically product): - **Joint(t) = S₃_LO(t) · S₃_HI(t)**. Significance is evaluated with a **global max-over-grid null** (look-elsewhere corrected): for each null realization we compute the maximum joint score anywhere on the eligible grid and compare to the observed maximum. When exceedances are zero, p-values are reported correctly as **upper bounds** p ≤ 1/(N_null+1). --- ## 4) Matched nulls and “court-ready” controls (how we prevent self-deception) We use several complementary audit controls designed to kill common failure modes: 1. **m-decoupled null**: within each bucket we independently scramble the phases for m=24 and m=48 (and in FULL mode for P separately), preserving amplitudes and sampling while destroying coherent coupling.2. **Global max-over-grid**: explicitly corrects the look-elsewhere effect.3. **Re-decode null (conservative)**: re-runs the Viterbi decode inside each null iteration (heavier but stricter).4. **Phi-scramble kill test (geometry destruction)**: per bucket, permute the mapping φ_uv↔V (preserve V marginals; destroy azimuthal harmonic coherence). A real geometric signal must collapse under this.5. **Hero-kill**: remove top-K “most supportive” samples near the peak window and recompute the statistic; robust signals degrade mildly.6. **Blocky resilience**: remove contiguous blocks (keep ~80%) and require peak/stationarity persistence.7. **Station jackknife + integration ladder**: drop antennas/stations by BASELINE decoding; if detectability fails, increase bucket DT to test whether loss is **sensitivity-limited** rather than physics-limited. --- ## 5) Results (Sgr A* 2017 day097, M87* 2017, M87* 2018) ### A) Sgr A* 2017 day097 (LO+HI, time-only, FULL mode)Using HI+LO dtermcal uvfits and a common 60 s grid with guardrails (window points=41, NEFF_MIN=30), we find a **dual-band common-coverage joint peak**: - **Joint S₃ ≈ 0.76** with **S₃_HI ≈ 0.90** and **S₃_LO ≈ 0.84**, at a well-interior UTC epoch (not a boundary artifact),- **global p ≤ 4.99975×10⁻⁵** with **N_null = 20000** and **0 exceedances**. This result is **court-controlled**:- **Phi-scramble kill (FULL mode)** collapses the defined joint grid (geometric coherence required).- **Hero-kill** reduces the peak by ~10% but does not destroy it (distributed support).- **Re-decode null** remains significant at the depth tested (0/1000 exceedances → p ≤ 9.99×10⁻⁴).- **Station jackknife** shows the event is not a single-station glitch; when a backbone station is removed, detectability becomes **time-resolution/sensitivity limited**, and is recoverable by integration ladder. A key sensitivity demonstration: dropping the ALMA-identified station ID suppresses recoverability at fine DT, but increasing integration to **DT=150 s** restores detection with **p ≤ 5×10⁻⁵** under both **look-elsewhere** and **fixed-time** audits, supporting the interpretation “**sensitivity-limited, not source-limited**.” ### B) M87* 2017 (dual-band replication + “frozen giant” stationarity mode)For M87* (2017) we reproduce joint coherence under the same audit philosophy (matched nulls, hero-kill, resilience). In addition, we adopt a **mass/time-scale consistent interpretation**: over an ~8 h EHT scan, M87* corresponds to O(1) gravitational time τ, so rapid event phenomenology is not expected to mirror Sgr A*. Instead we introduce a **stationary lattice mode** appropriate to a “frozen giant”: - decode is **locked** (Hops ≈ 0 at DT=600 s),- the relevant statistic becomes **Median S₃** over the core (stationarity),- we explicitly identify a **residual drift** (connection-like nuisance) while showing that **Z₃ coherence persists** after detrending. Controls cleanly separate effects:- **Phi-scramble kills** the coherence (geometric dependence).- **Time-shuffle randomizes** the drift without fabricating Z₃ coherence (trend ≠ signal). With **N_null=20000**, we find **p ≤ 4.99975×10⁻⁵** for the stationary-lattice statistic at DT=600 s, consistent with a **stationary lattice confirmed** in the operational sense (locked state + significant geometric Z₃ coherence). A **station jackknife** at DT=600 s (base and drops) retains significance with p ≤ 5×10⁻⁵ across tested scenarios, passing a Bonferroni-corrected threshold comfortably. ### C) M87* 2018 (single-band Stokes-I, pseudo-dual replication)The available 2018 processed product contains RR/LL but effectively zero RL/LR, so FULL mode is not possible. We therefore:- run **I-only** with γ_I = wrap(arg I48 − 2 arg I24),- and introduce a **pseudo-dual split** (random 50/50 within bucket) to emulate dual-band jointness as an internal consistency test. In pseudo-dual DT=600 s mode:- Median S₃(A) ≈ 0.325 and Median S₃(B) ≈ 0.318 (both stable),- **Hops = 0** (locked),- drift_res persists (trend nuisance, consistent with M87 stationarity picture). A 20k null suite yields **p ≈ 1.05×10⁻³** for the pseudo-dual joint statistic (supporting replication rather than headline). Importantly, a corrected kill-test based on **scramble-generated kill nulls** (NSCR=200) gives:- scramble median ≈ 0.014,- **p_kill ≈ 0.005**,confirming that the pseudo-dual coherence is also **geometric** (φ_uv coherence required), not a time-only artifact. --- ## 6) Unified picture and why the scaling matters (Sgr A* vs M87*)The combined results support a single coherent interpretation: - **Sgr A*** behaves like a **fast glass–crystal**, where event-like Z₃ coherence appears as localized peaks in time, visible simultaneously in LO and HI under strict common-coverage guardrails.- **M87*** behaves like a **frozen lattice** over scan times: the discrete label k(t) is locked, while an instrumental/channel drift may appear in residuals; nonetheless, Z₃ coherence persists and is demonstrably geometric. This is exactly the behavior expected under gravitational-time scaling: a fixed wall-clock observing night spans many characteristic times for Sgr A* but only ~O(1) for M87*, making “event vs stationary” a natural split. --- ## 7) Scope and non-claims (explicit)We emphasize again: “holonomy,” “torsion,” and “projector drift” are used **only** as **operational descriptors** of the inferred phase-transport proxy and its statistics. We do **not** claim:- spacetime torsion,- parity-odd gravity,- or any modification of GR dynamics,based on these results alone. What we do claim is narrower and testable: a discrete harmonic-phase organization (m=24/48 with Z₃ coherence structure) is detectable in EHT products under a strict, kill-tested, look-elsewhere-corrected audit protocol, replicating across **Sgr A*** and **M87*** (2017 and 2018), with physically consistent behavior under mass/time-scale changes. --- ## 8) Reproducibility artifactsAll analyses are implemented as **single-cell, numeric-only Colab scripts** that save “court packages” (.npz) containing:γ(t), k(t), r(t), S₃(t), joint statistics, peak metadata, coverage masks, and null exceedance counts. This permits independent re-audit without re-running the full null suite. **Bottom line:** the “Bank → Projector → Holonomy → EHT stats” chain is no longer a metaphor; it is an operationally defined, kill-tested measurement pipeline with cross-source replication and explicit separation of geometric coherence from instrumental drift.

Keywords

Crystalline Axiverse

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!