Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Omni-Governance Framework (OGF): A Tiered Approach to GDPRCompliant, Bias-Resilient AI in Decentralized Ecosystems

Authors: Suha Afaneh; Rami Almatarneh;

Omni-Governance Framework (OGF): A Tiered Approach to GDPRCompliant, Bias-Resilient AI in Decentralized Ecosystems

Abstract

The rapid evolution of Web 4.0, which is fundamentally based on a decentralized, AI-powered internet, demands governance frameworks that harmonize innovation with ethical imperatives. Current solutions for privacy preservation and algorithmic fairness in decentralized ecosystems remain fragmented, struggling to balance regulatory compliance (GDPR, EU AI Act) with technical scalability and bias resilience. In this paper we present the Omni-Governance Framework (OGF), a tiered architecture designed to address three key challenges: (1) the tradeoff between privacy and fairness in federated learning, (2) regulatory inconsistencies across jurisdictions, and (3) the growing vulnerability of classical encryption in a post-quantum world. The OGF architecture integrates three interconnected tiers: the first tier (T1) enforces GDPR compliance through Rényi Differential Privacy (RDP) and a scalable blockchain-based consent mechanism that mathematically links privacy budgets (ϵ) to fairness degradation (ΔF) to measure how much privacy is preserved (ϵ) with how much fairness might be affected (ΔF), helping to strike a thoughtful balance between the two; the second tier (T2) mitigates bias through fairness-constrained synthetic data generation and edge AI deployment, reducing latency by optimizing computational costs = ()/ ; and finally, the third tier (T3) introduces quantum-safe governance with latticebased homomorphic encryption Enc(∇) = + mod and Decentralized Autonomous Ethics Committees (DAECs) that use quadratic voting Vote Cost = ∑ !" to democratize decision-making. OGF’s cross-tier synergies resolve critical gaps in existing frameworks like FATE and PySyft, for example, synthetic data from Tier 2 enhances federated dataset diversity in Tier 1, while neuromorphic auditors in Tier 3 detect bias drift in real time via spiking neural networks # = $ % ∑% &'$ ∑( !'$ !()). The modular structure of the proposed framework enables incremental adoption, depending on an organization's readiness and goals, in line with regulatory maturity, in addition, its quantumresistant design prevents emerging threats to decentralized AI. While challenges remain, such as a 15% increase in latency at Tier 3 due to encryption overhead and ethical concerns associated with tokenized redress, OGF offers a unified framework to bridge the gap between current regulatory requirements with future technological limitations. This work presents a scalable blueprint for ethical AI governance in the Web 4.0 era, ensuring privacy preservation, bias mitigation, and democratized accountability.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!