Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Prediction of daily streamflow using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems and group method of data handling approaches: a case study of kone river, binh dinh province

Authors: Dinh, Thi Linh; Phung, Dai Khanh; Nguyen, Thi Thuc Anh;

Prediction of daily streamflow using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems and group method of data handling approaches: a case study of kone river, binh dinh province

Abstract

Accurate streamflow forecasting plays a vital role in water resource engineering, management, and planning. This study evaluates the performance of the Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) models in predicting daily streamflow. Rainfall and streamflow data, collected from rain gauges and hydrological stations in the upstream area of the Kone River in Binh Dinh Province, were used as inputs for the models and tested across various input scenarios. Model performance was assessed using three statistical metrics: the coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). The results revealed that the ANFIS model consistently outperformed the GMDH model, achieving the highest R² value of 0.94 and the lowest RMSE (64.6 m³/s) and MAE (14.2 m³/s). Additionally, Scenario 1 demonstrated the best predictive performance across both models. This study successfully developed reliable approaches for daily streamflow forecasting and provided valuable insights into the influence of input variables on prediction accuracy.

Keywords

Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS), Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH), daily streamflow, prediction

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!