
High-capacity machine learning models, such as Gradient Boosting Machines(GBM) and deep Random Forests, often succumb to the bias-variance trade-offwhen training data is scarce (N < 500). While they offer low bias, they frequentlyoverfit noise or fail to approximate smooth functions due to discrete partitioning.Conversely, classical linear models (OLS) offer stability but lack the capacity tomodel complex dynamics. This paper introduces Influence-Weighted BaggedSplines (IWBS), a specialized ensemble architecture designed for high-complexity,small-data regimes. IWBS combines the flexibility of randomized additive splineswith a novel Out-of-Bag (OOB) Stability Weighting mechanism. Unlike stan-dard bagging, which averages learners uniformly, IWBS penalizes ensemble mem-bers that exhibit high prediction instability on held-out data. We benchmark IWBSagainst fully tuned Tree Ensembles (GBM, Random Forest) and specialized small-data solvers (Gaussian Processes, GAMs, Kernel Ridge Regression) across physical,economic, and biological domains. Results demonstrate that IWBS achieves state-of-the-art performance in signal-rich tasks (Concrete, Moneyball), outperformingboth tree-based methods and kernel smoothers by capturing high-frequency non-linearities without overfitting. Furthermore, we establish the method’s boundaryconditions, showing that in high-noise regimes (Diabetes), global smoothers likeKernel Ridge Regression remain superior to structure-discovery approaches.
Splines, Machine Learning, Bagging, IWBS, Small Data, Regression
Splines, Machine Learning, Bagging, IWBS, Small Data, Regression
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
