Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Prácticas de automedicación y nivel de autocuidado en Adultos con Diabetes Mellitus 2 de la UMF 75

Authors: González Cruz, Lucero Edith; Herrera Olvera, Imer Guillermo; Morales Salazar, Rosa Elena;

Prácticas de automedicación y nivel de autocuidado en Adultos con Diabetes Mellitus 2 de la UMF 75

Abstract

Resumen Título: Prácticas de automedicación y nivel de autocuidado en adultos con diabetes mellitus 2 (DT2) de la UMF 75. Antecedentes: Se ha determinado la prevalencia del autocuidado en personas con DT2 sin embargo no hay algún reporte de la prevalencia de las prácticas de automedicación. Objetivo: Asociar los hábitos de automedicación y el nivel de autocuidado en personas con DT2. Método: Se efectuó un análisis transversal a 280 participantes entre 45 – 59 años diagnosticados con DT2 y adscritos a la UMF No. 75 del IMSS en el 2024, como instrumento se hizo uso de la “Escala Valoración de Agencia de Autocuidado (ASA)” actualizada en el 2009 y la asociación entre el nivel de autocuidado y la práctica de automedicación se fijó al efectuar una prueba x2 de tendencia lineal. Resultados: Mostrados en frecuencias y porcentajes, participaron 280 adultos de los cuales el 62.1% fueron mujeres y el 37.9% hombres, de los 280 participantes el 35.4%tienen un nivel de autocuidado bajo, 22.5% un nivel medio y el 42.1% un nivel alto; el 40% practican la automedicación y el 60% no se automedican. Conclusión: Con un valor p > 0.05 se demostró que no existe asociación entre las prácticas de automedicación y el nivel de autocuidado. Abstract Title: Self-medication practices and self-care level in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) at UMF 75. Background: The prevalence of self-care in people with T2D has been determined, however there is no report on the prevalence of self-medication practices. Objective: To associate self-medication habits and the level of self-care in people with T2D. Method: A cross-sectional analysis was carried out on 280 participants between 45 and 59 years of age diagnosed with T2D and assigned to UMF No. 75 of the IMSS in 2024. The "Self-Care Agency Assessment Scale (ASA)", updated in 2009, was used as an instrument, and the association between the level of self-care and the practice of self-medication was established by performing a x2 linear trend test. Results: Shown in frequencies and percentages, 280 adults participated, of which 62.1% were women and 37.9% were men; 35.4% have a low level of self-care, 22.5% a medium level and 42.1% a high level; 40% practice self-medication and 60% do not self-medicate. Conclusion: With a p-value > 0.05, it was demonstrated that there is no association between self-medication practices and the level of self-care.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!