Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Presentation . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Presentation . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Cosmic evolution of the star formation efficiency in Milky Way-like galaxies.

Authors: Segovia Otero, Alvaro;

Cosmic evolution of the star formation efficiency in Milky Way-like galaxies.

Abstract

Star formation and feedback shape ecosystems within and around galaxies, yet the details on how they affect the interstellar medium (ISM) and shape galactic-scale star formation histories are actively debated. In my talk I use the high resolution (20 pc) VINTERGATAN cosmological zoom-in simulation to study the evolution of the ISM and its star formation efficiency per free-fall time on giant molecular cloud (GMC) scales across cosmic time. The simulated Milky Way-like galaxy experiences periods of starburst activity and short global gas depletion times (1 < z < 5) when the cold ISM reaches its densest and most turbulent states. More quiescent star formation during a secularly evolving phase (z < 1) shows a less dense and turbulent cold ISM with order of magnitude longer global gas depletion times of a few Gyr. Despite significant changes in global star formation timescales, density, and velocity dispersion distributions as a function of redshift, the average star formation efficiency remains at a constant ~1%. This is due to the coupling between the kinetic-to-gravitational energy ratio in star-forming regions with time, consistent with resolved observations of star-forming GMCs (cf. PHANGS). By connecting state-of-the-art simulations with observations, my results can help relieve tensions between turbulence-regulated efficiency models and observational efficiency estimators, improving our understanding of the mechanisms regulating star formation and feedback in galaxies.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!