Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Conference object . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

HI-selected dark sources and low surface brightness galaxies

Authors: O'Beirne, Tamsyn; V. A. Kilborn, M. E. Cluver, O. I. Wong, and the WALLABY Team;

HI-selected dark sources and low surface brightness galaxies

Abstract

Our understanding of galaxy evolution is coupled to those galaxies that historically have been observable, but it is only in recent years that we have had the technology to detect optically dark and low surface brightness galaxies in large numbers. It is challenging to search for these sources just using optical data. However, those that are sufficiently gas-rich can be detected in neutral atomic hydrogen (HI) surveys, and we now have the resolution to do optical cross matching. We examine the optical counterparts of the 1829 HI detections in three pilot fields in the Widefield ASKAP L-band Legacy All-sky Blind surveY (WALLABY) using data from the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys DR10. With its significantly improved resolution compared to the previous large area HI surveys, HIPASS and ALFALFA, WALLABY is better able to localise the source of the emission and resolve tidal features. We find that 17% (315) of the detections are low surface brightness galaxies (LSBGs; mean g-band surface brightness within 1 Re of > 23 mag arcsec−2) and 3% (55) are dark. The LSBGs have low star formation efficiencies, and 75% of them had not been previously catalogued. Of the dark sources, 38 pass reliability tests, with 13 showing tidal interaction signatures, while 25 are candidates for isolated galaxies with high HI masses, but low stellar masses and star-formation rates. Studying dark and LSBGs allows us to learn more about the efficiency of the baryon cycle in these extreme galaxies.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!