Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Efficacy of Combining Solifenacin with Tamsulosin in the Treatment of Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Authors: Ali Wafaa Mohammed Zaki; Yousif Salim Khalaf; Prof. Dr. Ehab Jasim Mohammad;

The Efficacy of Combining Solifenacin with Tamsulosin in the Treatment of Symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Abstract

Background: Alpha-blockers are commonly used to manage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), while antimuscarinic agents are prescribed for overactive bladder (OAB). Combining these therapies may improve symptoms, but concerns remain regarding safety in men with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Objective: To evaluate the safety of combined solifenacin (SOLI) and tamsulosin oral controlled absorption system (TOCAS) therapy compared with tamsulosin monotherapy in men with LUTS and BOO. Methods: This comparative study included men aged over 45 years with LUTS and BOO for at least three months, total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥ 8, BOO index ≥ 20, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) ≤ 12 mL/s, and voided volume ≥ 120 mL. Participants were divided into two groups: one received tamsulosin 0.4 mg alone, and the other received tamsulosin 0.4 mg plus solifenacin 10 mg. Primary safety outcomes were Qmax and detrusor pressure at Qmax (PdetQmax). Secondary assessments included post-void residual volume (PVR), IPSS, and voided volume. Results: At the end of treatment, both groups showed significant improvements in PdetQmax and Qmax. However, the mean increase in PVR was significantly higher in the combination therapy group at all follow-up points, particularly at weeks 2, 12, and end of treatment. Urinary retention occurred in only one patient receiving combination therapy. Study limitations included lack of evaluation of prostate size, high prostate-specific antigen levels, drug cost, and adverse effects. Conclusion: The combination of TOCAS 0.4 mg and solifenacin 10 mg demonstrated efficacy without clinically significant increased risk of urinary retention in men with LUTS and BOO, supporting its safe use in appropriately selected patients.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average