
This article presents a comparative analysis of the dimensional accuracy of digital models obtained throughdirect laser scanning of silicone impressions and scanning of Type IV and Type V gypsum models used in prostheticdentistry. A calibrated Johanssen gauge block with a nominal reference distance of 7 mm was employed as theexperimental standard. The results demonstrate that digital models derived from Type IV super-gypsum (Elite Rock)exhibit the highest dimensional accuracy. Direct scanning of impressions showed slightly greater deviations, primarilyattributed to the application of anti-glare spray required for optical scanning of reflective silicone surfaces. While directimpression scanning is clinically viable and offers workflow efficiency, its accuracy remains marginally inferior to gypsumbaseddigitization for high-precision prosthetic applications. The findings emphasize the importance of material selectionand scanning methodology optimization in modern CAD/CAM dental workflows
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
