Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

DENTAL IMPRESSIONS AND GYPSUM MODEL SCANNING ACCURACY USING A LASER SCANNER ARE COMPARED

Authors: Akhmadov Inomjon Nizomitdinovich; Matchanov Boburbek Ulug'bekovich;

DENTAL IMPRESSIONS AND GYPSUM MODEL SCANNING ACCURACY USING A LASER SCANNER ARE COMPARED

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of the dimensional accuracy of digital models obtained throughdirect laser scanning of silicone impressions and scanning of Type IV and Type V gypsum models used in prostheticdentistry. A calibrated Johanssen gauge block with a nominal reference distance of 7 mm was employed as theexperimental standard. The results demonstrate that digital models derived from Type IV super-gypsum (Elite Rock)exhibit the highest dimensional accuracy. Direct scanning of impressions showed slightly greater deviations, primarilyattributed to the application of anti-glare spray required for optical scanning of reflective silicone surfaces. While directimpression scanning is clinically viable and offers workflow efficiency, its accuracy remains marginally inferior to gypsumbaseddigitization for high-precision prosthetic applications. The findings emphasize the importance of material selectionand scanning methodology optimization in modern CAD/CAM dental workflows

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!