Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

EdgeSec-Benchmark: IoT Security Resilience Dataset (ESP32, Raspberry Pi 5, Hardware-AES)

Authors: Rakshit, Haranath; Banerjee, Subhasis;

EdgeSec-Benchmark: IoT Security Resilience Dataset (ESP32, Raspberry Pi 5, Hardware-AES)

Abstract

Experimental Dataset: Hardware-Accelerated Security in Edge IoT This repository contains the complete telemetry and performance logs from a longitudinal experimental campaign evaluating the resilience of ESP32-based secure edge nodes communicating with a Raspberry Pi 5 Gateway. The data was collected to validate the performance of hardware-accelerated AES-GCM encryption under conditions of signal degradation (-88 dBm), network congestion (Bufferbloat), and power cycling. 📄 ASSOCIATED MANUSCRIPT This dataset supports the findings presented in the research article: "Cross-Layer Benchmarking of Hardware-Accelerated Security in Edge IoT Under Wi-Fi Signal Degradation and Network Congestion" 📂 DATASET STRUCTURE EdgeSec_Benchmark_Dataset/ │ ├── 01_Raw_Data/ (Original Server Logs - Raspberry Pi 5) │ ├── Day-1/ │ │ ├── Baseline_Server_Day-1.csv │ │ ├── Noise_Server_Day-1.csv │ │ ├── Distance_Server_Day-1.csv │ │ ├── Stress_Server_Day-1.csv │ ├── Day-2/ ... │ ├── Day-3/ ... │ └── Client_Serial_Logs/ (Forensic Boot Logs - ESP32) │ └── Stress_Client_DayX.txt │ ├── 02_Processed_Data/ (Cleaned & Merged) │ ├── Total_Baseline.csv │ ├── Total_Noise.csv │ ├── Total_Distance.csv │ └── Total_Stress.csv │ ├── 03_Analysis_Code/ (Reproducibility) │ ├── EdgeSec_Reproducibility_Analysis.ipynb │ └── extract_scientific_datapoints.py │ └── README.txt 📊 COLUMN DEFINITIONS seq: Sequence ID for calculating Packet Loss. latency_ms: End-to-End Latency (Server_Rx - Client_Tx). rssi: WiFi Signal Strength (dBm). crypto_time_us: Encryption overhead (microseconds). heap_free: Available memory (Bytes). throughput: Bandwidth usage (Bytes/sec). ⚠️ DATA NOTE (NTP Exclusions) While the Raw Data contains 30,953 packets, 322 packets (1.04%) were generated prior to client-side NTP synchronization. These were analytically excluded from the Processed Data to preserve precise end-to-end latency calculations, resulting in exactly 30,631 valid data points. 🛠 USAGE & REPRODUCIBILITY The included Jupyter Notebook (EdgeSec_Reproducibility_Analysis.ipynb) and Python extraction script contain the logic required to process these CSVs and reproduce all statistical figures and Kruskal-Wallis H-tests found in the associated research manuscript. Required Environment: Python 3.x (Tested on 3.14.0). To avoid Kernel execution errors (WinError 2), please ensure the following dependencies are installed in your virtual environment before running the notebook: pandas>=2.0.0 numpy>=1.24.0 scipy>=1.10.0 seaborn>=0.12.0 matplotlib>=3.7.0 jupyter>=1.0.0

Related Organizations
Keywords

IoT, Benchmarking, Industrial IoT, AES-GCM, Security, Edge Computing, ESP32

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average