Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

INTERDISCIPLINARY INTEGRATION IN CREATIVE LESSON FRAMEWORKS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STEM AND HUMANITIES CLASSROOMS

Authors: Yunusaliyeva, Shakhnoza; Zaynieva, Umeda;

INTERDISCIPLINARY INTEGRATION IN CREATIVE LESSON FRAMEWORKS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STEM AND HUMANITIES CLASSROOMS

Abstract

This article explores the role of interdisciplinary integration in the design and implementation of creative lesson frameworks, with a particular focus on a comparative analysis of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) and Humanities classrooms. The study examines how interdisciplinary approaches enhance creativity, critical thinking, and learner engagement by bridging subject boundaries and promoting holistic learning experiences. Through comparative analysis, the article highlights similarities and differences in pedagogical strategies, instructional methods, and learning outcomes between STEM and Humanities contexts. Special attention is given to the use of project-based learning, problem-solving tasks, and creative assessment techniques as tools for interdisciplinary integration. The findings suggest that while STEM classrooms tend to emphasize innovation through applied problem-solving and technological tools, Humanities classrooms foster creativity through interpretative, reflective, and discursive practices. The article concludes that effective interdisciplinary integration in creative lesson frameworks contributes to the development of transferable skills and supports learner-centered education across both academic domains.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!