
Abstract Limiting global warming under the Paris Agreement—with its goal of keeping temperatures well below 2°C while pursuing 1.5°C—requires rapid, sustained emissions cuts. Within this constraint, fairness concerns arise because implementation must reflect fairness and CBDR‑RC. This study develops an effort‑sharing framework that varies weights on equality, capability, and responsibility across ten regions, combining them with diverse decarbonization rates and assumptions about end‑century net‑negative emissions to generate a wide set of regional pathways. The results show substantial variation in climate‑fair net‑zero CO2 years: developed regions face earlier and steeper reductions due to greater historical responsibility and capability, while developing regions receive more near‑term emissions space to support development. Two themes emerge: deep, front‑loaded mitigation in high‑income regions is essential, and reliance on future removals can weaken early action and shift burdens to lower‑income regions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
