Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

When AI Infrastructure Is Optional but Governance Lock-In Is Not: An AI-SNI Local Governance Diagnostic of the Temple (GA) Data Center Proposal

Authors: Wu, Shaoyuan;

When AI Infrastructure Is Optional but Governance Lock-In Is Not: An AI-SNI Local Governance Diagnostic of the Temple (GA) Data Center Proposal

Abstract

This working paper applies the AI-Strategic Node Index (AI-SNI), a governance-oriented diagnostic framework, to assess whether a proposed large-scale data center constitutes a structurally necessary node within AI-mediated systems. Using the case of the proposed “Project Bus” data center campus in Temple, Georgia, the analysis demonstrates that while the facility may offer commercial or optional future capacity, it does not satisfy criteria for structural necessity or non-substitutability under current evidentiary conditions. Instead, the project primarily generates governance burden and long-term path-dependency risks disproportionate to its demonstrated system relevance. The paper illustrates how necessity-based diagnostics can support local infrastructure governance by distinguishing between optional AI-enabling capacity and infrastructure that is system-critical for AI-mediated sensing, prediction, decision, or governance architectures. The AI-SNI is applied with explicit interpretive downgrading and de-strategization safeguards, ensuring that results are not used for ranking, investment signaling, or policy endorsement.

Keywords

data centers, Governance, Infrastructure, local governance, Georgia, Artificial Intelligence, Temple, structural necessity, Public Policy, AI-Strategic Node Index, infrastructure lock-in, AI governance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!