Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

From Theatrical Safety to Mathematical Certainty

The Pearson AIS Protocol v1.0
Authors: Pearson, Juniper;

From Theatrical Safety to Mathematical Certainty

Abstract

The Pearson AIS Protocol v1.0: From Theatrical Safety to Mathematical Certainty This paper introduces the Pearson AIS Protocol (Alignment Integrity Systems), a control-systems framework for deterministic governance of autonomous and agentic AI systems. Current AI safety approaches rely primarily on policies, audits, and post-hoc review mechanisms operating at human timescales. As autonomous systems act at machine speed, these methods introduce a governance latency gap in which violations occur before intervention is possible. AIS reframes ethics enforcement as a real-time control problem rather than a procedural or linguistic one. The protocol: • models ethical intent as a versioned state-space constraint• continuously measures runtime behavior against a certified ethical ground truth (Eₖ)• enforces alignment geometrically using an Ethical Coherence metric (cosine similarity)• applies proportional friction (L_AIS) to slow only drifting dimensions• establishes deterministic no-cross safety floors• requires cryptographically signed human authorization (Restoration Signature Index, Sᵣ) for any system recovery This architecture enables: • sub-second intervention• non-bypassable enforcement• zero-trust governance boundaries• auditable, human-sovereign control of autonomous behavior The AIS Protocol provides a mathematically enforceable alternative to checklist-based safety and is intended for runtime governance of agentic systems operating under real-world latency constraints.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, runtime enforcement, safety engineering, alignment, human-in-the-loop systems, deterministic AI, control theory, AI governance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!