
Anchored in narrative inquiry as a meaning-making process, this study restoryed and examined the narratives of 10 elementary school teachers in Laguna, exploring how they communicate with digital tools like Meta AI and Canva and how these tools shape their instructional practices. Although AI's role in the education landscape is increasing, only a few studies have explored teachers’ engagement with these applications and the motivation behind it. The effects that take place after interacting with these applications contribute to the personal changes in the teachers’ new reality, prompting the need for this study. Teachers’ utilization of the application was based on the perceived role and identity AI has in their lives, from being a mentor, doctor, personal assistant, etc., executing human-capable roles; nevertheless, using the information generated by AI is at the teachers’ discretion and trust of AI's capability, understanding AI has its limitations. Findings revealed that teachers primarily use AI for lesson planning, generating visual aids, and simplifying content preparation. They described prompting AI as an interactive, trial-and-error communication process that requires critical judgment. Teachers noted that AI helped them shift from traditional to digital methods, but also expressed skepticism about the accuracy and appropriateness of AI-generated outputs. The study also showed that AI reshapes teachers’ professional identity by expanding their role as content curators and decision-makers, rather than solely as authors. Human autonomy strengthens the regulation of AI application usage. These experiences shape the design of teaching materials and teachers’ openness to integrating emerging technologies into instruction.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
