
This framework introduces the concepts of Nomological Determination and Ontological Techno-regulation for safety-critical AI systems. Shifting away from stochastic models prone to 'hallucinations,' QBI-CORE AIC leverages the Kuramoto Model to achieve a physical decision-making consensus through Phase Synchronization. The architecture defines the Order Parameter R as a deterministic metric for compliance with the EU AI Act, ensuring that the system's physical state inherently aligns with regulatory validation. Furthermore, the paper details the optimization of Phase Lag (\alpha) to enable fluid obstacle avoidance without compromising the mathematical traceability of the safety kernel. This approach transforms Cognitive Governance from a bureaucratic layer into an integrated cognitive infrastructure.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
