Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

On the Structural Conditions of Physical Description

Authors: Panagis, Christoforos;

On the Structural Conditions of Physical Description

Abstract

This monograph presents Unified Substrate Theory (UST): a necessity–based framework for identifying the minimal structural conditions underwhich physical description is possible. UST proceeds by suspending all ontological commitments—particles, fields, spacetime, quantum states, or fundamental interactions—and instead asks a prior question: what structural constraints must hold for any physical theory to be formulable, testable, and stable under admissible perturbations?The theory advances no microscopic model and proposes no new fundamen- tal entity. Its method is structural and eliminative.The work is divided into three logically closed layers. The first establishes the admissibility protocol and derives discrete logarithmic scalestructure, a unique dominant spectral band, emergent geometry, emergent time as a spectral ordering observable, the necessity of matter as diagnos-tic carriers, gravity as a conservative low–energy closure, and cosmology as a non–fundamental fixed–point regime. The second supplies the minimaldynamical content consistent with these constraints, formulating regeneration dynamics in symbol–first form and proving a no–plurality theoremfor persistent logarithmic bands under admissible perturbations, noise, and coarse–graining. The third presents a closed set of empirical tribunals, eachsatisfying strict pre–declaration, null calibration, scan correction, and outcome reporting criteria. UST is intentionally fragile. Its claims are not adjustable and admit explicit conditions of structural breakdown. Empirical data serve solely as atribunal of applicability; agreement does not confirm the framework, while violation of its structural necessities terminates it. Established theories—classical mechanics, quantum theory, general relativity, and ΛCDM cosmology— are neither reduced nor replaced, but situated as valid regime–level descrip-tions within explicitly delimited domains. UST asserts no ontology and no finality. Its sole aim is to delineate which elements of physical description are enforced by necessity, which areconditional, and which exceed the limits of admissible explanation

Keywords

physics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green