Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Cloud-Native Network Monitoring: Tools, Architectures, and Best Practices

Authors: Burramukku, Narendra Reddy;

Cloud-Native Network Monitoring: Tools, Architectures, and Best Practices

Abstract

Cloud-native networking has transformed modern enterprise and service provider infrastructures by enabling highly dynamic, scalable, and distributed environments based on microservices, containers, and multi-cloud deployments. While these architectures improve agility and resource efficiency, they also introduce significant challenges in maintaining visibility, performance assurance, and security. Traditional network monitoring approaches are inadequate for handling ephemeral workloads, high-velocity telemetry, and complex inter-service communications. This paper presents a comprehensive review of cloud-native network monitoring, focusing on monitoring tools, architectural frameworks, and operational best practices suitable for modern cloud-native ecosystems. It systematically analyzes open-source and commercial monitoring solutions, including Prometheus, Grafana, OpenTelemetry, ELK Stack, and cloud-provider-native platforms, highlighting their roles in metrics collection, logging, and distributed tracing. The study further examines key architectural models such as centralized, distributed, and hybrid monitoring frameworks, as well as agent-based and agentless approaches, emphasizing scalability, fault tolerance, and integration with orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. Best practices for observability design, metric selection, alerting, and automated incident management are discussed in the context of DevOps and Site Reliability Engineering (SRE). Additionally, the paper identifies critical challenges related to scalability, hybrid and multi-cloud observability, security, and privacy, while outlining emerging research directions including AI/ML-driven monitoring, autonomous remediation, and edge observability. By consolidating tools, architectures, and operational strategies, this paper provides a structured reference for researchers and practitioners seeking to design, deploy, and optimize effective cloud-native network monitoring systems

Keywords

Cloud-native networking; Microservices; Kubernetes; Hybrid cloud; Multi-cloud environments; AI-driven monitoring; DevOps integration

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green