
Description: Most teams can eventually describe what they want (results) and the types of activities they have to design to get there. Where projects succeed or fail is the space in between activities and results: the risks, evidence, context, assumptions, and people factors that shape whether activities actually lead to results. RECAP is a structured way to examine that space —so programs becomes legible to decision-makers and support measurable change. Citation: Salehi, Roxana, Making Complex Programs Legible to Decision-Makers The RECAP© Framework for Constructing Program Theory Using Results-Based Management, V.2, 2026, www.vitusHQ.com
leadership, program design, Design (project), Program Evaluation/trends, Evaluation, Program Evaluation
leadership, program design, Design (project), Program Evaluation/trends, Evaluation, Program Evaluation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
