
This paper offers evidence-based guidance on integrating AI in education, grounded in cognitive science, neuroscience, and empirical research. It examines chatbot strengths and limitations, their effects on students’ memory, learning habits, and study practices, and the governance structures institutions need to protect academic integrity and learning quality. The paper also considers factual reliability, hallucination risk, environmental and infrastructure costs, copyright and data governance, and the gap between vendor claims and actual performance. Its core argument is that AI should enhance learning as a thinking amplifier, not replace human reasoning, and operate within assessment and governance frameworks aligned with institutional values, offering practical guidance for educators and institutions navigating AI use.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
