
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18447493 , 10.5281/zenodo.18603840 , 10.5281/zenodo.18605675 , 10.5281/zenodo.18644376 , 10.5281/zenodo.18628211 , 10.5281/zenodo.18644449 , 10.5281/zenodo.19152790 , 10.5281/zenodo.18604504 , 10.5281/zenodo.18604878 , 10.5281/zenodo.18603991 , 10.5281/zenodo.18603841 , 10.5281/zenodo.18617917 , 10.5281/zenodo.18447494 , 10.5281/zenodo.18615511
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18447493 , 10.5281/zenodo.18603840 , 10.5281/zenodo.18605675 , 10.5281/zenodo.18644376 , 10.5281/zenodo.18628211 , 10.5281/zenodo.18644449 , 10.5281/zenodo.19152790 , 10.5281/zenodo.18604504 , 10.5281/zenodo.18604878 , 10.5281/zenodo.18603991 , 10.5281/zenodo.18603841 , 10.5281/zenodo.18617917 , 10.5281/zenodo.18447494 , 10.5281/zenodo.18615511
This report introduces the Political Dysfunction Tax ($T_{pd}$): the implicit levy paid to entropy through governance inefficiency. By constructing a Waste Ledger (military overspend, administrative friction, incarceration costs) and an Opportunity Ledger (suppressed health innovation, migration restrictions, lead poisoning), we calculate a Global Governance Efficiency Score of 30-52%. Current governance destroys $101 trillion annually in unrealized potential, including $34T from delayed cures, $57T from migration restrictions, and $6T from lead exposure, suggesting civilization operates far below its technological possibilities.
Category: Academic Paper, Public Policy, Political Science, Economics | Genre: Political Science, Welfare Economics, Public Policy | Target Audience: Researchers, Policy Makers, Economists, Political Scientists
opportunity-cost, political-dysfunction, welfare-economics, public-choice, rent-seeking, migration-economics, regulatory-burden, governance-efficiency, clinical-trials
opportunity-cost, political-dysfunction, welfare-economics, public-choice, rent-seeking, migration-economics, regulatory-burden, governance-efficiency, clinical-trials
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
