Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Pharmacovigilance among Undergraduate Medical and Dental students in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Authors: Rupa Arun Korde; Priya Shodan;

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Pharmacovigilance among Undergraduate Medical and Dental students in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Abstract

Background and Aim: Young healthcare professionals are future prescribers and therefore need adequate understanding of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and the importance of timely reporting. Early engagement in pharmacovigilance programs is necessary to improve awareness, strengthen reporting practices, and ensure patient safety. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding pharmacovigilance and ADR reporting among undergraduate medical and dental students at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Methods: The cross-sectional, questionnaire-based descriptive study was conducted among final-year medical (n=90) and dental (n=61) students. A 20-item self-administered questionnaire with open-ended and closed-ended questions was used to assess participant’s KAP related to pharmacovigilance and ADR reporting. Results: Medical students demonstrated better pharmacovigilance knowledge than dental students across all domains, including correct definition (93.3% vs 55.7%), identifying drug safety issues (90% vs 63.9%), awareness of India's Pharmacovigilance Programme (100% vs 98.4%), knowledge of regulatory frameworks and reporting tools. Most medical students recognized the importance of including ADR reporting in pharmacology practicals (87.8% vs 73.8%) and its establishment in hospitals (97.8% vs. 72.1%). While most medical students knew about ADR reporting forms (96.7% vs. 14.8%) and had seen ADR cases during clinical postings (81.1% vs. 16.4%), actual reporting rates were still low in both groups (42.2% vs. 3.3%). Conclusion: Both medical and dental students demonstrated basic knowledge and positive attitude toward pharmacovigilance; however, ADR reporting practices were low comparatively low among dental students. These findings underscore the need for structured pharmacovigilance training programs to improve ADR reporting practices and enhance patient safety.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green