Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
External research report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

AIVO Evidentia

AIVO Evidentia

Abstract

External AI systems increasingly generate decision-relevant representations of enterprises for customers, investors, counterparties, and regulators. These representations occur outside organizational control and typically leave no durable record. When such outputs later become relevant in board review, litigation, audit, or regulatory inquiry, enterprises are often unable to evidence what was said, when it was said, or how leadership responded at the time. This technical note describes AIVO Evidentia, an operational evidence-layer system developed to address this evidentiary gap. Evidentia records how external AI systems describe an enterprise at defined points in time and preserves those representations as immutable records suitable for later legal, audit, and governance review. The system does not attempt to control AI behavior, assert legal duties, or imply regulatory obligation. This note is descriptive, not normative, and should be read alongside the companion governance paper on evidentiary gaps arising from external AI representations.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback